Throughout the centuries, the mythical Stone Tower has been a fascinating enigma for geographers, historians, and archaeologists worldwide. This location is mentioned in Claudius Ptolemy’s Geography as the midpoint on the Silk Road, the vast network of trade routes connecting Europe and Asia, facilitating the exchange of goods, cultures, and ideas.

The Stone Tower, known in Latin as Turris Lapidea and in Greek as Lithinos Pyrgos, represents one of the oldest mysteries in the history of geography and cartography. But where exactly was it located? Ptolemy provided the exact coordinates, yet it has never been found.

The Silk Road was a network of overland routes that, since the 2nd century BCE, connected the great civilizations of Asia and Europe. The Stone Tower marked a strategic and symbolic point within this vast network.

Ptolemy Stone Tower
Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan, is one of the proposed locations for the Ptolemy Stone Tower. Credit: Solijonovm1996 / Wikimedia Commons

Ptolemy, the Greco-Egyptian geographer from Alexandria, wrote about this tower around the year 140 CE in his treatise Geography, a foundational document that endures as one of the oldest cartographic texts of classical antiquity.

Ptolemy notes that the Stone Tower was the most important landmark along the route, an essential stop for the caravans traveling the arduous and dangerous journey of the Silk Road. There, travelers could rest, resupply, and trade before continuing toward new destinations.

Ptolemy’s Geography consists of eight books, in which he mentions the Stone Tower up to ten times, a frequency that reflects the importance of this site at the time. In Book I, he describes it as a well-known and frequented landmark for travelers, following what had been previously written by Marinus of Tyre, a Greek geographer from the 1st century CE.

…we reduced in accordance with the appropriate correction both the distance from that crossing of the Euphrates to the Stone Tower, which amounts to 876 schoinoi or 26,280 stadia, as well as from the Stone Tower to Sera (China?), the metropolis of the Seres, a journey of seven months, or according to Marinus, 36,200 stadia measured along the same parallel [through Rhodes]. […] But the route from the Stone Tower to the Seres is subject to bad storms (for according to Marinus’ suppositions it falls along the parallels passing through the Hellespont and Byzantium), so that there must have also been numerous pauses in the journey.

Ptolemy, Geography I.2
Ptolemy Stone Tower
The Sulaiman-Too Mountains in Kyrgyzstan are another candidate site. Credit: A. Savin / Wikimedia Commons

However, he only mentions its coordinates once, placing it at latitude 43 and longitude 135 in his gradation system. But its exact location has always been a subject of debate among researchers and historians.

This is due to the difficulty in translating his coordinates to precise modern locations, as ancient cartographers relied on routes traced by caravans, whose positioning data were often imprecise.

From medieval times to the present, various locations have been proposed for the Stone Tower, with four main sites identified by researchers as possible candidates for its location.

Ptolemy Stone Tower
Some researchers propose that the tower was at the Erkeshtam Pass between China and Kyrgyzstan. Credit: Eddieagunn / Wikimedia Commons

In the 11th century, the scholar Al-Biruni suggested that the tower might be in the city of Tashkent in Uzbekistan, whose name means “stone castle or city” and bears linguistic symbolism with the term pyrgos, which in Greek means “tower” or “fortress.”

In the 19th century, researcher Joseph Hager supported this theory based on Tashkent’s proximity to Ptolemy’s mentioned latitude (43° north), although it is not an exact match, as it is actually at 41.2° north.

Another proposed location is Sulaiman-Too, a mountain in Osh, Kyrgyzstan, which also has great historical and cultural value. The mountainous landscape of Sulaiman-Too and its proximity to ancient routes have led modern researchers, like Claude Rapin and Riaz Dean, to think it could be the true site of the Stone Tower.

Ptolemy Stone Tower
Daraut-Kurgan is another of the sites proposed as a possible location for the Stone Tower. Credit: Kmaksat / Wikimedia Commons

Meanwhile, British explorer Aurel Stein, who extensively traveled through Central Asia in the 20th century, argued that the Stone Tower might be in the area of the Karategin valley, in the village of Daraut-Kurgan in southwestern present-day Kyrgyzstan. According to Stein, the description Ptolemy provides matches the terrain characteristics of that area, where travelers had to ascend a gorge before reaching the supposed location of the tower.

Paul Bernard reached the same conclusion as Stein when he analyzed in 2005 the route taken by the caravan of Maes Titianus, who traveled along the Silk Road in the late 1st century CE. Ptolemy states that he reached the Stone Tower, once again based on the lost work of Marinus of Tyre:

Marinus tells us that a certain Macedonian named Maen, who was also called Titian, the son of a merchant and a merchant himself, recorded the length of his journey to the Stone Tower, though he did not reach Sera himself but sent another person there.

Ptolemy, Geography I.11
Ptolemy Stone Tower
Map showing the five possible locations of the Stone Tower: Tashkent, Sulaiman-Too, Erkeshtam, Daraut-Kurgan and Tashkurgan. Credit: DutchTreat / Wikimedia Commons

Tashkurgan, in Xinjiang, China, is another modern possibility. In 2014, researcher Irina Tupikova applied spherical trigonometry to reinterpret Ptolemy’s coordinates and concluded that Tashkurgan had a high probability of being the place described. This method, incorporating complex mathematical data, offered a new perspective in the debate over the Stone Tower’s location.

Another theory suggests that the Stone Tower might be the same as the Hormeterium or “trading station,” also mentioned in Ptolemy’s Geography. This site, identified by some scholars as the current Erkeshtam on the China-Kyrgyzstan border, would have been a strategic spot for trade and restocking supplies. However, Ptolemy states in his work that Erkeshtam is located five degrees east of the Tower.

Despite advances in positioning technology and archaeological research, the Stone Tower remains an unresolved mystery. Discovering its location would be of great importance not only for the study of ancient geography but also for locating other significant reference points in the region, similarly (and imprecisely) described by Ptolemy. It would even facilitate more focused archaeological research aimed at finding the material remains of the tower.


This article was first published on our Spanish Edition on October 30, 2024: La Torre de Piedra, el lugar que marcaba el punto medio de la Ruta de la Seda y cuyas coordenadas menciona Ptolomeo, nunca ha sido encontrada


  • Share on:

Discover more from LBV Magazine English Edition

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.